POSITIVE MONEY
Recent Articles
Minority rules:
Scientists discover tipping point for the spread of ideas
Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion. The finding has implications for the study and influence of societal interactions ranging from the spread of innovations to the movement of political ideals.
CLICK HERE for more
What this means is we only need 10% of the population to understand how these few individuals are robbing us and enslaving us to transform the narrative society believes in, to stop them.
Scientists discover tipping point for the spread of ideas
Scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have found that when just 10 percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, their belief will always be adopted by the majority of the society. The scientists, who are members of the Social Cognitive Networks Academic Research Center (SCNARC) at Rensselaer, used computational and analytical methods to discover the tipping point where a minority belief becomes the majority opinion. The finding has implications for the study and influence of societal interactions ranging from the spread of innovations to the movement of political ideals.
CLICK HERE for more
What this means is we only need 10% of the population to understand how these few individuals are robbing us and enslaving us to transform the narrative society believes in, to stop them.
Tariq Ali on TRUMP and More
Comment by Rafael Zambrana January 23, 2017
Comment by Rafael Zambrana January 23, 2017
CLICK THE PHOTO TO SEE VIDEO
While Hillary Clinton continues to blame the Russians for her loss and remains oblivious to taking responsibility for her enormous error in judgement during the electoral campaign, more and more observers keep on popping up offering their own take on what happened. It was a clear unexpected result for many "seasoned" political pundits, including myself who have become cynical about taking seriously whatever labeled "democracy" we have in the West. So it's appreciated to hear someone like Tariq Ali offering his bit on Trump, and also on how he sees what's happening in Brazil where the crooks were able to turn an investigation against them, to instead kick out of power those who were in the process of doing the investigation, with international repercussions due to Brazil's involvement with the BRICS coalition.
In a way what happened in Brazil appears to have some similarity with what happened in the US in the election of Trump, and in Britain with their BREXIT from the European Union. In all these cases the power of the masses to vote their own way against the customary controls exerted by the corporate Media that was openly hostile against those who ended up winning, it's remarkable and begs research in a more detailed manner for what really happened.
There are many other social instances around the world that appear to follow the same pattern, like the election of Duterte as the Philippines president, the Germany's protest against the US central bank by thousands of regular people in more than a hundred cities, etc.
There appears to be a slight awakening from the docile masses, without actually being too clear about why they act one way or another, more as a "gut" feeling based on intuition used by the voters to behave in unpredictable ways. I have been toying with the idea the 2012 Mayan calendar supposed transition from one realm to a new one more conscious than the former, could perhaps be taking place in a more subtle gradual way than the sharp "end of the world" scenario the corporate media had suggested. Of course the fact Trump the clown won doesn't seem to appear as a wise choice for the voters, however this time the masses did show independence from the heavy propaganda machine the corporate media played against Trump and the loud support for Killary Clinton she got from even establishment Republicans who preferred her to their own candidate Trump.
The results were that notwithstanding all these "official" support Killary Clinton received, she still lost the elections (while winning the popular vote in gross numbers) The point is the Democratic Party had also been rocked by the open preference of their voters for what appeared an "unelectable socialist candidate" Bernie Sanders, who was pushed aside by the party establishment in such a gross way, explained in detail by the leaked Clinton's emails, the backlash practically insured Trumps election.
What appears to have happened in my view, is that after the Obama-Killary confrontation in 2008 elections when both contenders disappeared in a weekend, after confering with the party establishment, the following week Killary came out in support of Obama her opponent, a secret deal had been concocted by the party establishment for killary to let Obama win and for her to win the next elections.
The problem however was that times had changed and the mood of the voters didn't go along with the plans of the establishment, resulting in the Dems shooting their own foot by sticking to their old scheme, when they should have been paying attention to the voters' new reality and follow it.
For his part Trump did connect with the mood of the people and told them exactly what they wanted to hear, regardless of him attempting to fulfill his promises, which now seems to have become a realization by some of his supporters who almost immediately are beginning to regret their vote for him when they hear their pension or medical plan is being jeopardized.
In a way what happened in Brazil appears to have some similarity with what happened in the US in the election of Trump, and in Britain with their BREXIT from the European Union. In all these cases the power of the masses to vote their own way against the customary controls exerted by the corporate Media that was openly hostile against those who ended up winning, it's remarkable and begs research in a more detailed manner for what really happened.
There are many other social instances around the world that appear to follow the same pattern, like the election of Duterte as the Philippines president, the Germany's protest against the US central bank by thousands of regular people in more than a hundred cities, etc.
There appears to be a slight awakening from the docile masses, without actually being too clear about why they act one way or another, more as a "gut" feeling based on intuition used by the voters to behave in unpredictable ways. I have been toying with the idea the 2012 Mayan calendar supposed transition from one realm to a new one more conscious than the former, could perhaps be taking place in a more subtle gradual way than the sharp "end of the world" scenario the corporate media had suggested. Of course the fact Trump the clown won doesn't seem to appear as a wise choice for the voters, however this time the masses did show independence from the heavy propaganda machine the corporate media played against Trump and the loud support for Killary Clinton she got from even establishment Republicans who preferred her to their own candidate Trump.
The results were that notwithstanding all these "official" support Killary Clinton received, she still lost the elections (while winning the popular vote in gross numbers) The point is the Democratic Party had also been rocked by the open preference of their voters for what appeared an "unelectable socialist candidate" Bernie Sanders, who was pushed aside by the party establishment in such a gross way, explained in detail by the leaked Clinton's emails, the backlash practically insured Trumps election.
What appears to have happened in my view, is that after the Obama-Killary confrontation in 2008 elections when both contenders disappeared in a weekend, after confering with the party establishment, the following week Killary came out in support of Obama her opponent, a secret deal had been concocted by the party establishment for killary to let Obama win and for her to win the next elections.
The problem however was that times had changed and the mood of the voters didn't go along with the plans of the establishment, resulting in the Dems shooting their own foot by sticking to their old scheme, when they should have been paying attention to the voters' new reality and follow it.
For his part Trump did connect with the mood of the people and told them exactly what they wanted to hear, regardless of him attempting to fulfill his promises, which now seems to have become a realization by some of his supporters who almost immediately are beginning to regret their vote for him when they hear their pension or medical plan is being jeopardized.
It looks like Trump has derailed the globalists' plans of imposing these supposed "trade" schemes that in fact were planned in SECRET for 5 long years with the purpose to end Democracy and impose a corporate rule over the world. Killary Clinton was about to force it on her own people and all the signatory nations for the benefit of her corporate masters. I'm relieved she failed miserably.