POSITIVE MONEY
Rothschild and the lost Malaysian Plane Connection
by Rafael Zambrana March 25, 2014
by Rafael Zambrana March 25, 2014
Recent Articles
AND THE
Courtesy of the Venus Project
Jacob Rotchschild benefits by the disappearance of Malaysian flight MH370 by becoming the single owner of a semiconductor patent approved by the US patent office only 4 days after the plane disappeared. The other 4 owners of that patent were in that plane according to RT in Spanish (I can't find the news piece in RT English).
The patent is divided by 5 owners with 20% each. One of the owners is Freescale Semiconductor of Austin Texas, and the other four owners are Chinese employees of the company: Peidong Wang, Zhijun Chen, Zhijong Cheng y Li Ying, all of them from the city of Suzhou. And all of them passengers in the lost Malaysian plane disappeared on March 8, according to Eternity.
If anyone of the patent holders dies, the others would expand their percentage of ownership equally. If four of the five partners die, the one sole owner gets 100% of the benefits. In this case the only owner of the patent is Freescale Semiconductor, and this company is owned by Blackstone which is in turn owned by Jacob Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild dynasty of bankers who have been accused of running the financial Cabal that controls most of the Western world using Fractional Reserve Banking to force all societies where they control their central banks, to become indebted to this Cabal in order to have currency to trade with and function as an economy.
Is this a lucky coincidence for Rothschild? Speculations online are already on the move.
The patent is divided by 5 owners with 20% each. One of the owners is Freescale Semiconductor of Austin Texas, and the other four owners are Chinese employees of the company: Peidong Wang, Zhijun Chen, Zhijong Cheng y Li Ying, all of them from the city of Suzhou. And all of them passengers in the lost Malaysian plane disappeared on March 8, according to Eternity.
If anyone of the patent holders dies, the others would expand their percentage of ownership equally. If four of the five partners die, the one sole owner gets 100% of the benefits. In this case the only owner of the patent is Freescale Semiconductor, and this company is owned by Blackstone which is in turn owned by Jacob Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild dynasty of bankers who have been accused of running the financial Cabal that controls most of the Western world using Fractional Reserve Banking to force all societies where they control their central banks, to become indebted to this Cabal in order to have currency to trade with and function as an economy.
Is this a lucky coincidence for Rothschild? Speculations online are already on the move.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SNOPES.com DECLARES THIS THEORY AS --- FALSE
I refute in RED Text the assertion by SNOPES.com the theory of a connection between the Malaysian plane disappearance and Jacob Rothschild as FALSE.
The fact is we don't yet know. RAFAEL
SNOPES "arguments".
Origins: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared over the South China Sea on 8 March 2014 with 239 persons (227 passengers and 12 crew members) aboard. Several days later, a conspiracy theory was floated on the Internet that four of the passengers on that flight were all co-holders of a recently issued, highly valuable patent and the disappearance of Flight 370 was engineered to eliminate them so that remaining co-holder of the patent could reap all the royalties from it for himself.
The following lines ("the improbabilities of such a theory...") show Snopes.com is itself just theorizing about what really happened without being certain. It says "it is not clear the four men...." However it has already declared it FALSE.
The improbabilities of such a theory are numerous. For starters, it's not clear the four men referenced as patent co-holders actually were on Flight 370, as their names (as rendered above) don't appear on the flight manifest. (It's possible that the seeming absence of some matching names from the manifest could be due to slight differences in the transliterations of those persons' names from Chinese to English, however.)
Snopes declares "this patent doesn't sound like a breakthrough type of patent" and yet what do they know? They are not experts on that field. It could be very valuable but here they are speculating in the dark offering zero real arguments to declare it FALSE.
Moreover, the patent in question is dated 11 March 2014 and involves a "system for optimizing number of dies produced on a wafer." That doesn't sound like a highly valuable, "breakthrough" type of patent that would prompt the murder of four people (much less the death of 235 other innocent parties) in order to gain exclusive control of it. It looks to be a patent for a procedure that moderately improves the efficiency of a particular manufacturing process, not something with a huge market base and a vast potential for profit.
Snopes again is speculating without having actual inside knowledge of what the contract really states. Using words like "presumably" and "Typical" show they have no clue if these 4 Chinese were owners of the patent or not.
Additionally, the men listed are not actually the patent holders: they're the inventors/applicants, with the patent itself having been assigned to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., of Austin, Texas. Presumably Freescale Semiconductor is their employer, and it's typical that engineers working in the employ of companies are required by the terms of their employment to assign ownership of their discoveries and inventions to their employers (and thus usually do not receive royalties from any resulting patents).
Snopes below is speculating "it's also not a given" which shows they don't know really what the situation is, and yet they flatly stated the suggestion is FALSE.
It's also not a given that if all but one of the co-holders of a patent dies, "then the remaining one patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent" as if a patent were some form of tontine to be awarded to the last man standing. Unless prior arrangements had been made in that regard, the share of the patent held by the deceased may pass to his heirs or estate through the usual inheritance process.
Snopes below speculates without foundation. The Rothschild are also part owners of Carlyle Group and even perhaps the TPG Group Holdings. You don't have to own 100% of the stock to control a corporation and gain much larger benefits than smaller non-voting stock holders.
Finally, although the Rothschild name may be a talisman for many conspiracy theorists, it isn't true that Jacob Rothschild "owns" Freescale Semiconductor. Freescale is a public company whose stock is held, in part, by 152 different institutional shareholders. The Blackstone Group, at which Jacob Rothschild serves as a member of the company's International Advisory Board, is one of the largest of those institutional holders (with over 196 million shares), but the Carlyle Group and TPG Group Holdings both own a number of Freescale shares equal to that held by Blackstone.
Snopes seems to be trying to divert attention from the theory suggesting there could be a link between Jacob Rothschild and the Malaysian plane, WITHOUT OFFERING ANY SUBSTANCE TO THEIR DECISION TO DECLARE IT FALSE. And it is of course impossible for a chicken-poop blog with few resources like Snopes.com is, to do the proper investigation to be able to declare it FALSE or TRUE.
So the question is why should they even try? Are they there to SPIN any knowledge that could aid humankind to wake up from the Matrix it is enslaved in?
Who are these turds?
SNOPES.com DECLARES THIS THEORY AS --- FALSE
I refute in RED Text the assertion by SNOPES.com the theory of a connection between the Malaysian plane disappearance and Jacob Rothschild as FALSE.
The fact is we don't yet know. RAFAEL
SNOPES "arguments".
Origins: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared over the South China Sea on 8 March 2014 with 239 persons (227 passengers and 12 crew members) aboard. Several days later, a conspiracy theory was floated on the Internet that four of the passengers on that flight were all co-holders of a recently issued, highly valuable patent and the disappearance of Flight 370 was engineered to eliminate them so that remaining co-holder of the patent could reap all the royalties from it for himself.
The following lines ("the improbabilities of such a theory...") show Snopes.com is itself just theorizing about what really happened without being certain. It says "it is not clear the four men...." However it has already declared it FALSE.
The improbabilities of such a theory are numerous. For starters, it's not clear the four men referenced as patent co-holders actually were on Flight 370, as their names (as rendered above) don't appear on the flight manifest. (It's possible that the seeming absence of some matching names from the manifest could be due to slight differences in the transliterations of those persons' names from Chinese to English, however.)
Snopes declares "this patent doesn't sound like a breakthrough type of patent" and yet what do they know? They are not experts on that field. It could be very valuable but here they are speculating in the dark offering zero real arguments to declare it FALSE.
Moreover, the patent in question is dated 11 March 2014 and involves a "system for optimizing number of dies produced on a wafer." That doesn't sound like a highly valuable, "breakthrough" type of patent that would prompt the murder of four people (much less the death of 235 other innocent parties) in order to gain exclusive control of it. It looks to be a patent for a procedure that moderately improves the efficiency of a particular manufacturing process, not something with a huge market base and a vast potential for profit.
Snopes again is speculating without having actual inside knowledge of what the contract really states. Using words like "presumably" and "Typical" show they have no clue if these 4 Chinese were owners of the patent or not.
Additionally, the men listed are not actually the patent holders: they're the inventors/applicants, with the patent itself having been assigned to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., of Austin, Texas. Presumably Freescale Semiconductor is their employer, and it's typical that engineers working in the employ of companies are required by the terms of their employment to assign ownership of their discoveries and inventions to their employers (and thus usually do not receive royalties from any resulting patents).
Snopes below is speculating "it's also not a given" which shows they don't know really what the situation is, and yet they flatly stated the suggestion is FALSE.
It's also not a given that if all but one of the co-holders of a patent dies, "then the remaining one patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent" as if a patent were some form of tontine to be awarded to the last man standing. Unless prior arrangements had been made in that regard, the share of the patent held by the deceased may pass to his heirs or estate through the usual inheritance process.
Snopes below speculates without foundation. The Rothschild are also part owners of Carlyle Group and even perhaps the TPG Group Holdings. You don't have to own 100% of the stock to control a corporation and gain much larger benefits than smaller non-voting stock holders.
Finally, although the Rothschild name may be a talisman for many conspiracy theorists, it isn't true that Jacob Rothschild "owns" Freescale Semiconductor. Freescale is a public company whose stock is held, in part, by 152 different institutional shareholders. The Blackstone Group, at which Jacob Rothschild serves as a member of the company's International Advisory Board, is one of the largest of those institutional holders (with over 196 million shares), but the Carlyle Group and TPG Group Holdings both own a number of Freescale shares equal to that held by Blackstone.
Snopes seems to be trying to divert attention from the theory suggesting there could be a link between Jacob Rothschild and the Malaysian plane, WITHOUT OFFERING ANY SUBSTANCE TO THEIR DECISION TO DECLARE IT FALSE. And it is of course impossible for a chicken-poop blog with few resources like Snopes.com is, to do the proper investigation to be able to declare it FALSE or TRUE.
So the question is why should they even try? Are they there to SPIN any knowledge that could aid humankind to wake up from the Matrix it is enslaved in?
Who are these turds?